Hottestgistnaija.com
Sent from my iPhone
LET THE PEOPLE DECIDE THEIR LEADERThe Osun Governorship election is a loud statement from the masses of our people on the fate of our politicians, to say: Enough Is Enough!So, in any State where the Governor is owing workers salaries, or has performed below expectation, the people should reject him for second term or for Senate and also reject his appointed or anointed successor, whether in PDP or APC.I however appeal to INEC to conduct itself and its activities with manifest integrity, transparency and honesty. It should not give the wrong impression that it is sympathetic to the ruling or opposition parties.I further appeal to the people of Osun to allow the Rerun election, mobilize themselves and reassert their will, and tell Nigerians clearly and convincingly, their true choice, as between the two leading contenders for the office of governorship.I can only appeal to the President to see to it that he bequeaths to us, an electoral regime that is totally free, that is more peaceful and credible, than the one that brought him into office, when he defeated a sitting President, in 2015.Let the people of Osun speak again!!!Ebun-olu Adegboruwa, Esq.Abuja, Nigeria.23/09/2018.Life without Christ is crisisSent from my iPhone
Advertisement
On 12 Sep 2018, at 14:00, Ebun-Olu Adegboruwa <[email protected]> wrote:NCC SHOULD STOP ARBITRARY CHARGES BY TELCOSI have noticed in recent times that virtually all the telecommunications companies have adopted a secrete method of fleecing their subscribers through a prohibitive data regime.With the recent increase in Facebook subscriptions, the proliferation of WhatsApp platforms and other social media devices, the Telcos have suddenly turned data subscription into their goldmines.This experience cuts across all the Telcom companies. No matter the volume of data that you subscribe to, it will be exhausted within days and you’re forced to renew and to keep renewing and renewing!Now the substance of the Telecommunications Act is that telecom services should be efficient, accessible and affordable. In most cases, the data network is so poor that it takes ages to download simple links. This is totally unacceptable.It will be recalled that when the GSM regime started in Nigeria, these same telcos were grandstanding and extorting subscribers, claiming that per second billing was not possible, until the famous boycott of 2003, which birthed the liberalization that is being capitalized upon today, by the telcos.It is the responsibility of the Nigerian Telecommunications Commission, to come to the rescue of all telecom subscribers, by ensuring a transparent, efficient and affordable data regime. There should be a simple, transparent method of verifying data usage, not this present regime of unilateral and arbitrary assessment by the telcos, that puts all subscribers at their mercy.The telcos having realized the current heat in the political space, are now desperately deploying an arbitrary data regime that takes them to the bank smiling.I therefore call upon the NCC, to probe all the telcos, in relation to the method of data assessment and usage and thereby rescue us from all the telcos, including the broadband and gsm providers.The use of telephone and data services cannot be said to be matters of private contract between subscribers and the telcos, anymore. Since telephone usage is attached to the freedom of speech and general communications, any subtle denial or restriction thereof, through a regime of profiteering, by the telcos, will be illegal and immoral.Enough of this extortion please.Ebun-olu Adegboruwa, Esq.,Lekki, Lagos.12/09/2018.Life without Christ is crisisSent from my iPhone
On 7 Aug 2018, at 16:31, Ebun-Olu Adegboruwa <[email protected]> wrote:AdvertisementILLEGAL INVASION OF THE NATIONAL ASSEMBLYNigerians woke up today to see the ugly side of governance, when hooded officers of the Department of State Security Services, DSS, invaded the hallowed premises of the National Assembly. There was no prior notice of any security issue in that area, to justify the said invasion.Elected representatives of the people of Nigeria, led by the courageous Honourable Boma, resisted the invasion and called the bluff of the DSS operatives, by taking their rightful space in the National Assembly premises.Not long thereafter, the President of the Nigerian Bar Association, issued a stern statement, warning of dire consequences for the government, if the DSS operatives were not withdrawn.In a matter of minutes, the Acting President also condemned the invasion and thereafter sacked the Director of DSS.I salute the courage of the people of Nigeria, especially members of the National Assembly, for their vigilance and courageous actions, to save our democracy. I totally agree with the Statements of the NBA and the Vee Pee.The Constitution in sections 4, 5 and 6 established the three arms of government of the Legislature, the Executive and the Judiciary, with separate powers and functions. They are to act independently and autonomously, without any interference from one arm of government in the affairs of the other.The DSS and the police are all part of the Executive arm of government and it is totally unconstitutional for the DSS to have invaded the premises of the National Assembly in such commando fashion, as if we are under military rule. This happened to Judges of late, when the same operatives of the DSS invaded their homes in the dead of the night.I commend the action taken by the Acting President, in due consultations with the President, I believe. This should be extended to all other security and law enforcement agencies, to follow the law and observe the due process of law, in all their dealings. Let us never allow security operatives, to take our people for granted.Nigerian women deserve special commendation and appreciation, for their tireless efforts to rescue and defend our democracy, coming from the Aba Women Riots, to the courageous exploits of Queen Amina of Zaria, the revolutionary strides of Mrs Funmilayo Ransome-Kuti, the sacrifices of Mrs Kudirat Abiola, etc and now Honourable Boma. Thus, it is expected that the Nigerian government will henceforth assign more roles for women, in order to make them part and parcel of governance.God bless Nigeria.Ebun-olu Adegboruwa, Esq.,07/08/2018Rccg Camp,Ogun State.Life without Christ is crisisSent from my iPhone
On 31 Jul 2018, at 13:53, Ebun-Olu Adegboruwa <[email protected]> wrote:NIGERIANS LOOK UP TO THE JUDICIARY TO SAVE DEMOCRACYThe events of the past few days, in Imo and Benue States, have become worrisome, especially in relation to the attempts to subvert democratic institutions.We have seen how policemen in Benue State, physically prevented lawmakers from gaining access to their place of work.It was also reported that a High Court in Benue State, had issued an order of injunction, restraining the speaker of the Benue State House of Assembly, from parading himself as such.In Imo State, it was reported that a court issued an order of injunction, restraining the Imo State House of Assembly, from proceeding with the impeachment of the Deputy Governor.Although the events are happening so fast, it is certain that most, if not all the disputes, will end up in the law courts.It is possible that Governor Samuel Otom may have questions to answer on the management of the resources of Benue State, or his performance in office generally, for I remember vividly that it was this same Governor that commissioned wheels barrows, at a time. However, that has to be dealt with in accordance with due process, not with policemen barricading the Assembly to enable 8 persons in a 30 member Assembly, to purported to commence processes to impeach the Governor. The era of lawlessness and impunity, promoted by previous lawless governments, is gone forever in our history as a nation.I cannot say whether the Deputy Governor of Imo State is an ex-convict or not, or whether or not he may be guilty of any misconduct warranting his impeachment, but once a court has issued and order of injunction restraining the Imo State House of Assembly on the impeachment, then it amounts to legislative rascality, for that House to have proceeded with the impeachment, as such is null and void and of no effect whatsoever.I urge the Judiciary to rise up to the occasion of the cascading voices of confusion and brigandage raging in our land. Even during the military, the Judiciary played its role of stabilizing the nation. It cannot shy away from that noble role now, given the songs of war coming from all the political divides. Let Judges decide cases according to law and according to their conscience, on whose side the pendulum of truth and justice tilts, and the heavens will surely not fall.I also urge our political leaders to consider the labours of our heroes past and the struggles of our living patriots, and give our nation the golden opportunity to practice true democracy, nurtured by the rule of law and respect for due process.Impunity and lawlessness cannot birth true progress and development, especially when justice, equity and fair play, have taken sudden flight. It may go your way today, but sorely and certainly, it will hinder you tomorrow.Let us keep following the constitution and the laws of our land, in all our dealings, and when we deviate, let the courts bring us back on tract, without fear, favour, affection or ill will.God bless Nigeria.Ebun-olu Adegboruwa, Esq.,Lekki, Lagos.31/07/2018.Life without Christ is crisisSent from my iPhone
On 24 Jul 2018, at 14:29, Ebun-Olu Adegboruwa <[email protected]> wrote:AdvertisementJOE IGBOKWE AND THE JUDICIARY:WITHDRAWAL OF COURT ACTIONOn Monday July 16, 2018, I took up Mr Joe Igbokwe, on his Facebook post, wherein he asserted that Governor Nyesom Wike bought judgment from the Supreme Court of Nigeria. Subsequently I filed a case at the Federal High Court, to get the Honourable Attorney-General of the Federation, to take steps to verify the allegation or prosecute the author.Mr Joe Igbokwe has since withdrawn the offensive post from his Facebook wall, he has retracted it, he has offered an unreserved apology and he has given a firm undertaking, not to engage in such conduct, in future, when he stated that:“It was a mistake and I take responsibility for my action. It was a personal opinion. This is to tender an unconditional and unreserved apology to all those felt (sic) offended by my post and a promise to avoid such drivel in future.”In my mind, this settles the substance of the case filed in court, which was meant to protect the judiciary as an institution, not necessarily to shield any person identified or suspected to be involved corrupt practices, from probe or prosecution.I have consulted widely, I have read and digested all comments and suggestions in this regard and I’m mindful to align with the view that the apology and undertaking of Mr Joe Igbokwe should suffice to put an end to the case filed in court.Accordingly, the entire claims stated Suit No. FHC/L/CS/1240/2018, between Ebun-Olu Adegboruwa, Esq. v. The Honourable Attorney-General of the Federation & Mr. Joe Igbokwe, have been wholly discontinued against all the defendants in the said suit. A notice of discontinuance has been filed at the Federal High Court on July 24, 2018, effectively withdrawing the case.Individual Judges may err, some lawyers may falter and even the judicial system may appear weak and feeble, but we cannot afford to destroy the institution itself, as the options for our nation, to function without a respectable judiciary, will be catastrophic. A society where the rule of might prevails cannot enjoy peace and prosperity.I thank you all for your kind support, observations, criticisms and counsel.Together, we shall make Nigeria great.Ebun-Olu Adegboruwa, EsqLekki, Lagos.24/07/2018Life without Christ is crisisSent from my iPhone
On 20 Jul 2018, at 10:21, Ebun-Olu Adegboruwa <[email protected]> wrote:EBUN-OLU ADEGBORUWA & CO.
Barristers, Solicitors, Consultants
Advertisement
‘Kogun Chambers, Jesus Arena Tel: 08100000758, 08100000759
Itedo Road, Off Admiralty Way, Lagos 08033016673, 08033246500
AdvertisementLekki Peninsular Scheme 1, Lekki, Lagos
PRESS RELEASE
JUDGMENT FOR SALE: ADEGBORUWA SUES JOE IGBOKWE, WANTS AGF TO PROSECUTE HIM, ASKS HIM TO STEP ASIDE FROM PUBLIC OFFICE
The case of the Facebook post of All Progressive Congress chieftain, Mr. Joe Igbokwe, accusing the Supreme Court of selling justice to the governor of Rivers State, Mr. NyesomWike, has now taken a new dimension, as legal luminary and human rights activist, Ebun-Olu Adegboruwa, has filed an action before the Federal High Court, Lagos, seeking to sanction Mr. Igbokwe, for what he considered to be his reckless utterance against the judiciary. Named as defendants in the suit are the Attorney-General of the Federation and Mr. Joe Igbokwe. In the suit, Mr. Adegboruwa is asking the court to direct Mr Abubakar Malami, SAN, to invite Mr. Joe Igbokwe for interview in order to give him the opportunity to substantiate his allegation against the judiciary, failing which he should be prosecuted and sanctioned. He is also asking Mr. Igbokwe to step down and vacate his office as General Manager of Lagos State Wharf Land Fee Collecting Authority and Public Relations Officer of the All Progressive Congress, and also a declaration that Mr Igbokwe is not a fit and proper person to be elected or appointed into any public office in any part of Nigeria.
On July 16, 2018, at about 15:20pm, Mr. Joe Igbokwe published the following statement:
“WIKE WILL NOT HAVE THE AUDACITY AND THE TEMERITY TO KILL AGAIN IN RIVERS STATE AND RUN TO THE SUPREME COURT TO BUY JUSTICE. IT WILL NEVER HAPPEN AGAIN IN NIGERIA WHERE BUHARI IS THE PRESIDENT.”
on his Facebook page. Upon reading it, Mr. Adegboruwa immediately took up Mr. Igbokwe, to substantiate the allegation. Similarly, the Rivers State Government also demanded explanations from Mr. Igbokwe and threatened court action. Subsequently, the Chief Justice of Nigeria, invited security agencies to probe Mr. Igbokwe’s allegations and deal with the judges found culpable and if the allegations are false, to take appropriate steps to prosecute Mr. Igbokwe.
Rather than withdraw the offending post, Mr. Igbokwe proceeded to issue a more comprehensive post, wherein he specifically stated that the Chief Justice of Nigeria was under the influence and payroll of Mr. Nyesom Wike.
In a 32 paragraph affidavit deposed to in support of the new suit, Mr. Adegboruwa is claiming that Mr. Igbokwe’s post is capable of generating loss of confidence in the judicial system, which will discourage people from seeking redress from the law courts and which will in turn lead to lawlessness and resort to self–help and rule of the might. He also said that it will lead to loss of patronage for lawyers, who would no longer be able to handle cases in court, given that it is now possible to buy justice with money. Mr. Adegboruwa is contending that as a public officer, Mr. Igbokwe should be involved in disparaging other public institutions and that his offending post is a clear case of abuse of public trust for which he should be sanctioned appropriately. He contends further that the Attorney-General of the Federation, being the leader of the official Bar in Nigeria and chief law officer of the federation, is the one best placed to take up the case against Mr. Igbokwe, on behalf of the judiciary, lawyers and indeed the general public.
Other reliefs being sought in the case are as follows:
“1.A DECLARATION that the 2nd defendant is not entitled to make any statement to the effect that a judgment of the Supreme Court of Nigeria was bought and paid for.
2.A DECLARATION that the statement of the 2nd defendant, to the effect that the judgment of the Supreme Court of Nigeria was bought and paid for is reckless, unjustifiable and amounts to an unwarranted denigration of the integrity and authority of the Supreme Court of Nigeria in particular and the judiciary in general.
3.A DECLARATION that the 1st defendant, being the leader of the official Bar in Nigeria and the chief law officer of the Federation, is under a statutory duty to interview, engage and demand from the 2nd defendant, proof of his statement that the judgment of the Supreme Court of Nigeria was bought and paid for, failing which the said 1st defendant should proceed to prosecute the said 2nd defendant.
4.A DECLARATION that the 2nd defendant is not a fit and proper person to be elected or appointed into or to hold any public office in any part of the federation of Nigeria.
5.AN ORDER directing the 1st defendant to forthwith interview, engage and demand proof from the 2nd defendant, of the latter’s statement that the judgment of the Supreme Court of Nigeria was bought and paid for, failing which the said 1st defendant should forthwith prosecute the said 2nd defendant.
6.PERPETUAL INJUNCTION, restraining the 2nd defendant, his servants, officers and agents, or otherwise howsoever, from further issuing, uttering, publishing or making any statement, of and concerning the judiciary and the legal profession in Nigeria, capable of undermining the credibility, authority, integrity and sanctity of judgments of the Supreme Court of Nigeria and of all other courts in in Nigeria, generally.
7.AN ORDER directing the 2nd defendant to forthwith vacate, relinquish and surrender any and all public positions that he presently occupies.”
The case, numbers as FHC/L/CS/1240/2018, is yet to be assigned to any court for hearing, but the detailed suit is reproduced herein.
IN THE FEDERAL HIGH COURT
IN THE LAGOS JUDICIAL DIVISION
HOLDEN AT LAGOS
SUIT NO: FHC/L/CS/1240/2018
BETWEEN:
EBUN-OLU ADEGBORUWA, ESQ. )APPLICANT
AND
1.ATTORNEY-GENERAL OF THE FEDERATION )RESPONDENTS
2.MR. JOE IGBOKWE )
ORIGINATING SUMMONS
BROUGHT UNDER:
1.SECTIONS 2, 4, 5, 6, 15 (3) (A) & 41, 42 & 46 OF THE 1999 CONSTITUTION
2.ARTICLES 12 & 13 OF AFRICAN CHARTER ON HUMAN & PEOPLES’ RIGHTS
3.SECTION 153 OF THE 1999 CONSTITUTION
4.UNDER THE INHERENT JURISDICTION OF THE HONOURABLE COURT
LET THE RESPONDENTS, of Lagos in the Lagos judicial division within thirty days after service of this summons on them, inclusive of the day of such service, cause an appearance to be entered for them to this summons which is issued upon the application of Ebun-Olu Adegboruwa, Esq., of ‘Kogun Chambers, Jesus Arena, Itedo Road, off Admiralty Way, Lekki Peninsular Scheme 1, Lekki, Lagos who claims (to be aggrieved over the statement of the 2nddefendant to the effect that a judgment of the Supreme Court of Nigeria was bought and paid for, which statement is without any substance and has rendered the judiciary and the entire legal profession in Nigeria liable to public ridicule and opprobrium), for the determination of the following questions:
1.Whether the 2nd defendant is entitled to make the following statement, of and concerning the judiciary, the Supreme Court of Nigeria and the legal profession in general, as stated in his Facebook post of July 16, 2018, at about 15:20pm:
“WIKE WILL NOT HAVE THE AUDACITY AND THE TEMERITY TO KILL AGAIN IN RIVERS STATE AND RUN TO THE SUPREME COURT TO BUY JUSTICE. IT WILL NEVER HAPPEN AGAIN IN NIGERIA WHERE BUHARI IS THE PRESIDENT.”
2.Whether the statement of the 2nd defendant, to the effect that a serving governor in Nigeria, Mr. Nyesom Wike, bought and paid for a judgment of the Supreme Court of Nigeria, is justified, justifiable or warranted.
3.Whether in the circumstances of the judiciary of the federal republic of Nigeria presently, it is possible to pay for and buy judgment in the Supreme Court of Nigeria.
4.Whether the statement of the 2nd Defendant, to the effect that Mr NyesomWike, being the incumbent Governor of Rivers State of Nigeria, bought and paid for a judgment of the Supreme Court of Nigeria, is not capable of undermining the credibility integrity, acceptability, functionality, sanctity and supremacy of the judgments of courts in Nigeria, especially the Supreme Court and thereby undermine the trade and practice of the Applicant and other lawyers in Nigeria.
5.Whether the statement of the 2nd defendant, to the effect that it is possible to buy judgment from the Supreme Court of Nigeria, is not reckless, jaundiced, mischievous and a deliberate assault upon the judiciary of Nigeria, the legal profession in Nigeria, capable of ruining the trade and practice of the Applicant and other lawyers in Nigeria.
6.Whether it is proper and lawful, for any citizen of Nigeria, especially one occupying any position of public trust, such as the 2nd defendant, to make a statement capable of undermining the good reputation, credibility, integrity and honour of the judiciary, especially the Supreme Court of Nigeria and the legal profession in general, to the detriment of the trade and practice of the Applicant and other lawyers in general.
7.Whether the 2nd defendant is not liable to defend, substantiate and prove his statement that the judgment of the Supreme Court of Nigeria was bought and paid for, failing which he should be sanctioned, damnifiedand prosecuted by the 1st defendant.
8.Whether the 1st defendant, as the official leader of the Nigerian Bar, is not under a statutory duty to uphold, defend and protect the judiciary of Nigeria, all judicial officers and indeed the legal profession, by taking up, engaging and prosecuting the 2nd defendant for his reckless statement that the judgment of the Supreme Court of Nigeria was bought and paid for.
9.Whether the Applicant is not entitled to an order of this Honourable Court, directing the 1st defendant to interview, engage and demand from the 2nd defendant, proof of his statement that the judgment of the Supreme Court of Nigeria was bought and paid for, failing which the 1st defendant should proceed to prosecute the 2nd defendant.
10.Whether in view of this statement, to the effect that a serving governor in Nigeria, Mr. Nyesom Wike, paid for and bought a judgment of the supreme Court of Nigeria, the 2nd defendant is a fit and proper person to be elected or appointed into any public office in any part of the Federation of Nigeria.
WHEREFORE the Applicant seeks the following reliefs against the Defendants:
1.A DECLARATION that the 2nd defendant is not entitled to make any statement to the effect that a judgment of the Supreme Court of Nigeria was bought and paid for.
2.A DECLARATION that the statement of the 2nd defendant, to the effect that the judgment of the Supreme Court of Nigeria was bought and paid for is reckless, unjustifiable and amounts to an unwarranted denigration of the integrity and authority of the Supreme Court of Nigeria in particular and the judiciary in general.
3.A DECLARATION that the 1st defendant, being the leader of the official Bar in Nigeria and the chief law officer of the Federation, is under a statutory duty to interview, engage and demand from the 2nd defendant, proof of his statement that the judgment of the Supreme Court of Nigeria was bought and paid for, failing which the said 1st defendant should proceed to prosecute the said 2nd defendant.
4.A DECLARATION that the 2nd defendant is not a fit and proper person to be elected or appointed into or to hold any public office in any part of the federation of Nigeria.
5.AN ORDER directing the 1st defendant to forthwith interview, engage and demand proof from the 2nd defendant, of the latter’s statement that the judgment of the Supreme Court of Nigeria was bought and paid for, failing which the said 1st defendant should forthwith prosecute the said 2nd defendant.
6.PERPETUAL INJUNCTION,restraining the 2nd defendant, his servants, officers and agents, or otherwise howsoever, from further issuing, uttering, publishing or making any statement, of and concerning the judiciary and the legal profession in Nigeria, capable of undermining the credibility, authority, integrity and sanctity of judgments of the Supreme Court of Nigeria and of all other courts in in Nigeria, generally.
7.AN ORDER directing the 2nd defendant to forthwith vacate, relinquish and surrender any and all public positions that he presently occupies.
Dated this……………….. day …………………………….2018
IN THE FEDERAL HIGH COURT
IN THE LAGOS JUDICIAL DIVISION
HOLDEN AT LAGOS
SUIT NO: FHC/L/CS/1240/2018
BETWEEN:
EBUN-OLU ADEGBORUWA, ESQ. ) APPLICANT
AND
1.ATTORNEY-GENERAL OF THE FEDERATION ) RESPONDENTS
2.MR. JOE IGBOKWE )
